Victoria Sausan v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
A jurisdiction application admitting to no appearance was dismissed for want of prosecution on 11.4.2019.
A jurisdiction application admitting to no appearance was dismissed for want of prosecution on 11.4.2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 69
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 31352 of 2010
Applicant :- Victoria Sausan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocatee,Umesh Vats
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
List has been revised. None appeared for the applicant even in the revised call.
The application is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, granted earlier stands vacated.
Order Date :- 11.4.2019 IA
Victoria Sausan
State Of U.P.
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court