The applicant failed to appear in person during the listing, resulting in the dismissal of the application under Section 482 CrPC for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 13613 of 2018
Applicant :- Shyam Sunder Pathak And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Saroj Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sudhanshu Srivastava
Hon'ble Rajiv Joshi,J.
List has been revised.
Nobody is present on behalf of the applicant to press this application. Accordingly, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 11.7.2019 T. Sinha
Shyam Sunder Pathak And 2 Others
Rajiv Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
