In a writ petition under Article 227, the High Court refused to quash criminal proceedings but directed that bail be considered if the applicant surrenders within 30 days and no coercive measures be taken during that period.
Refused quashing prayer; directed bail consideration upon surrender within 30 days; suspended coercive measures for 30 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 76
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8735 of 2019
Petitioner :- Ram Mohan Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Mukesh Kumar Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
decided in view of the settled law laid by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.
Order Date :- 29.11.2019
Priya
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the entire criminal prosecution can be quashed for lack of evidence at the interlocutory stage.
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail and suspension of coercive measures.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
R.P. Kapur Vs. State of PunjabReferred¶8
R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866 · Who else cites this
State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan LalReferred¶8
State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426 · Who else cites this
State of Bihar Vs. P.P.SharmaReferred¶8
State of Bihar Vs. P.P.Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192 · Who else cites this
Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful HaqReferred¶8
Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq
Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P.Referred¶11
Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P., 2004 (57) ALR 290
Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.Referred¶11
Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P., 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC)
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ram Mohan
State of U.P.
Manju Rani Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
