This was a matter under Article 227 of the Constitution originally listing as No. 6852 of 2019. The petitioner was absent for two consecutive hearings despite adjournments. The court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6852 of 2019
Petitioner :- Smt. Punam Respondent :- Daya Shankar Singh And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Singh,Sarvesh Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
On 20.9.2019, the matter was adjourned on the request of counsel for the petitioner. On 18.10.2019, no one was present on behalf of the petitioner, but in the interest of justice, the case was adjourned. Today again, no one is present to press the instant petition, even in the revised call.
The petition is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)
Order Date :- 19.10.2019 Jaideep/-
Smt. Punam
Daya Shankar Singh And 5 Others
Manoj Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
