This petition under Article 227 was dismissed. The petitioners were defendants in a suit instituted in 2017 for which expeditious disposal was sought. As no injunction operated, no cause for peremptory directions arose.
No directions issued; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2550 of 2019
Petitioner :- Gokul Prasad And 2 Others Respondent :- Civil Judge (Junior Division) Sharki Allahabad And Another
Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd. Ashraf
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
This petition has been preferred by the defendants in a suit for its expeditious disposal. The suit is one which has been instituted in 2017 itself and in which no injunction operates against the petitioner. Consequently, no cause arises for this Court to issue any peremptory directions as prayed for.
The petition is dismissed .
Order Date :- 11.4.2019 Arun K. Singh
(Yashwant Varma, J.)
Gokul Prasad And 2 Others
Civil Judge (Junior Division) Sharki Allahabad And Another
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
