In a writ petition under Article 227 challenging an application under Section 340 Cr.P.C., the High Court found no ground to issue peremptory directions and dismissed the petition.
The petition seeking peremptory directions regarding Section 340 Cr.P.C. was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2241 of 2019
Petitioner :- Smt. Sudha Jaiswal Respondent :- Shanker Suan Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Maurya
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
The Court finds no ground to issue peremptory directions as prayed for justifying the invocation of its power under Article 227 of the Constitution since the peremptory directions which are sought are in respect of an application under Section 340 Cr.P.C.
The petition is dismissed .
Order Date :- 9.4.2019 faraz
1 issue framed by the court
Whether peremptory directions are warranted under Article 227 regarding an application under Section 340 Cr.P.C.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. Sudha Jaiswal
Shanker Suan
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
