This petition under Article 227 challenged the Trial Court's order rejecting an ex parte injunction. The High Court found no palpable error in the findings and dismissed the appeal.
Petition dismissed; ex parte injunction application remains rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2242 of 2019
Petitioner :- Lalita Devi Respondent :- Incharge District Judge And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhineet Jaiswal,Ashutosh Sharma,Sheel Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
This petition impugns orders dated 03 August 2018 and 07 September 2018. The Trial Court has principally found that no grounds exist warranting the issuance of an ex parte injunction. The view so framed suffers from no palpable error warranting invocation of jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution.
The petition is dismissed .
Order Date :- 9.4.2019 faraz
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned orders denying an ex parte injunction warrants interference under Article 227 of the Constitution.
Lalita Devi
Incharge District Judge
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
