In an Article 226 matter, the High Court dismissed the petition after noting that the petitioner had already sought a stay of proceedings, rendering peremptory directions unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2184 of 2019
Petitioner :- Lalit Kumar Kashyap Respondent :- Smt. Anju Rani And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar,Santosh Kumar Mishra
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
Undisputedly the petitioner himself has moved an application for stay of proceedings before the Court concerned. Consequently no cause arises for framing of any peremptory directions for disposal of the suit.
The petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 12.4.2019 faraz
Lalit Kumar Kashyap
Smt. Anju Rani
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
