Single judge dismissed a writ petition seeking quashing of an impugned order and direction to allot land on lease. The court found no grounds for relief as the petitioner failed to appear and no substantive ground for interference was present. Interim orders were vacated.
Petitioner's reliefs dismissed; interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9647 of 2014
Petitioner :- Ram Khelawan & Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. & 14 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
Called in revise. None appeared to press the writ petition. In the circumstances, we ourselves have perused the record.
By means of the present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:
"(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 4.1.2012 passed by the respondent no.3 by annexing the order dated 14.01.2012(contained as Annexure no.5A to the writ petition) and further be pleased to quash the allotment proceeding of land adjoining to the sirsi dam on lease with in a period as fixed by this Court.
(ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing respondent no.3 to allot the land adjoining to the sirsi dam on lease to the petitioners with in a period as fixed by this Court.
(iii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing respondent no.3 to decide the representation dated 12.10.2013 contained as Annexure no.8 to the writ petition with in a period as fixed by this Court."
Having gone through the entire writ petition, we do not find any ground entitling the petitioner for grant of any of above reliefs. No interference, therefore, is called for.
Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 5.12.2018 JK Yadav
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition merits interference to quash an allotment order or direct allotment of land on lease.
Ram Khelawan
State Of U.P
Shashi Kant Gupta
Manju Rani Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
