The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 33899 of 2018 for want of prosecution as the petitioner did not appear on the date of hearing to press the petition. Any interim order stands vacated.
None;petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 33899 of 2018
Petitioner :- Anjum Khatun Respondent :- State Of U P And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjai Kumar Singh,Awadhesh Prasad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rakesh Bahadur
Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
The list has been revised. Even though Sri Rakesh Bahadur, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 is present but none is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the present writ petition.
Writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 28.11.2018 JK Yadav
Anjum Khatun
State Of U P
Shashi Kant Gupta
Manju Rani Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
