The court disposed of a writ petition filed in 2016 seeking protection. Due to the petitioners' and counsel's absence after three years and the presumption that interim relief was granted, the petition was partly allowed without a costs order.
Petition partly allowed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 323 of 2016
Petitioner :- Kiran Singh (Smt) And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shabana Nizam Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Raj Kumar Kesari
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
Order Date :- 18.9.2018 DKS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition requiring protection should be allowed after the interim order outlived its utility due to petitioner's absence for three years.
Kiran Singh (Smt) And Another
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
