The petitioner, Ram Pat Ram, requested liberty to file a fresh writ petition due to an inadvertent omission in the current prayer. The writ petition was dismissed with liberty granted.
Liberty granted to file a fresh petition with appropriate prayer. Present writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 29508 of 2018
Petitioner :- Ram Pat Ram Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sadhu Sharan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mahboob Ahmad
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; Shri Ravi Anand Agarwal, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents no. 1 & 2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that relevant prayer has been left to be made in the writ petition inadvertently, therefore, he does not wish to press this writ petition in the present form and seeks liberty to file a fresh petition with appropriate prayer.
With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 30.8.2018 Sunil Kr. Gupta
(Rajiv Gupta, J.) (Abhinava Upadhya, J.)
Ram Pat Ram
State Of U.P.
Abhinava Upadhya
Rajiv Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
