Petitioner failed to appear to press the writ petition. The court held the writ petition infructuous and dismissed it, vacating any interim order.
Writ petition dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 44409 of 2008
Petitioner :- M/S Jai Shanker Gramodyog Samiti Mirzapur Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
List has been revised. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition even in the revised call.
It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in the case. That apart the writ petition appears to have become infructuous.
It is, accordingly, dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 29.8.2018 A. Pt. Singh
(Rajiv Gupta, J.) (Abhinava Upadhya,J.)
M/S Jai Shanker Gramodyog Samiti Mirzapur
State Of U.P.
Abhinava Upadhya
Rajiv Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
