Anita Patel v. Union of India and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Held that the petitioner cannot demand higher compensation as she agreed to the rate in the acquisition agreement. The writ petition lacks merit and was dismissed.
Held that the petitioner cannot demand higher compensation as she agreed to the rate in the acquisition agreement. The writ petition lacks merit and was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 29
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 29343 of 2018
Petitioner :- Anita Patel Respondent :- Union Of India And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chandra Bhan Dubey,Surya Bhan Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Anant Kumar Tiwari,C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri Anant Kumar Tiwari has appeared for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and learned Standing Counsel has appeared for respondent Nos. 3 and 4.
The land of the petitioner has been acquired under the agreement wherein the rate of compensation has been mentioned.
The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the circle rate of the land is much higher whereas the land of the petitioners have been taken on a very lower rate.
The petitioner has agreed for the acquisition of the land at a particular rate mentioned in the agreement and as such he cannot demand any higher rate or additional amount.
The petitioner is not challenging the agreement which has been entered into between her and the contesting respondents.
In view of the above, we do not find any merit in the writ petition so as to direct payment of any higher compensation.
The writ petition, as such, lacks merit and is dismissed .
Order Date :- 5.9.2018 Nirmal
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner can claim higher compensation than the rate agreed upon in the acquisition agreement.
Anita Patel
Union Of India
3 Others
Pankaj Mithal
Saral Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court