In this default dismissal, the court observed that no one appeared to press the writ petition. The petition was dismissed accordingly, and any interim order was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 20918 of 2017
Petitioner :- Rajendra Krishna Saksena Respondent :- Ghaziabad Development Authority & Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Prashant Kanha Counsel for Respondent :- Ram Bilas Yadav,Mahesh Narain Singh
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
List has been revised. No one appears to press the petition.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed in default. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 17.11.2018 SK
Rajendra Krishna Saksena
Ghaziabad Development Authority
Bharati Sapru
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
