In this 2018 writ petition concerning matrimonial problems, the High Court held that the petitioner should pursue relief in the appropriate court and accordingly dismissed the writ petition without interference at this stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37668 of 2018
Petitioner :- Shanti Chauhan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
The petitioners seek relief relating to her matrimonial problems. It is open to them to pursue the appropriate Court. We are not inclined to interfere in the matter at this stage.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 16.11.2018 pks
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere in the petitioner's matrimonial problems via a writ petition.
Shanti Chauhan
State Of U.P.
Bharati Sapru
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
