The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Lallan Prasad against the State of UP. The court held that no personal prejudice was demonstrated and the petition did not qualify as a Public Interest Litigation, declining to interfere.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 33578 of 2018
Petitioner :- Lallan Prasad Respondent :- State Of U P And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Chandra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
The petition is in the nature of complaint. No personal prejudice has been shown to be suffered by him. The petition also does not qualify as PIL.
We are not inclined to interfere in the matter.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 16.11.2018 SK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition lacking personal prejudice and not qualifying as a PIL should be allowed or dismissed.
Lallan Prasad
State Of U P
Bharati Sapru
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
