Coram held that the petitioner failed to establish a case for issuing a quashing order regarding prescribed and appellate authority decisions, finding the petition infructuous due to lack of interest or survival of cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 20568 of 1990
Petitioner :- Triyugi Narain Respondent :- Addl.Commissioner IInd,Gorakhpur And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- S.R. Misra, A.K. Misra, S.S. Tripathi, Vrindavan Mishra
Counsel for Respondent :- SC
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
"to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 8.6.1987 and 26.7.1980, passed by the Prescribed Authority and Appellate Authority, respondent nos. 2 and 1, respectively."
Order Date :- 19.12.2018 Siddhant Sahu
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition justifies interference by this Court granting the prayed quashing relief.
Whether the cause of action survives or the petition has become infructuous.
Triyugi Narain
Addl.Commissioner IInd,Gorakhpur
Another
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
