G. Chandra v. Nathi Lal
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed Second Appeal No. 2959 of 1983 filed by G. Chandra against Nathi Lal for want of prosecution, noting that the notice to engage counsel was not received by the appellant.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order, if any, is vacated.
What the court decided
Court No. - 34
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 2959 of 1983
Appellant :- G. Chandra Respondent :- Nathi Lal Counsel for Respondent :- P.K. Singh,A.K.Singh,M.Alam,V.K. Dixit
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
- Notice was issued to appellant to engage another counsel vide order dated 23.11.2016 and sent by registered post A.D. on 24.11.2016. Perused Office Report dated 18.12.2018. Notice has not been received back, undelivered or otherwise. Service is deemed sufficient.
- Called in revised. None appeared to press this appeal.
- Dismissed for want of prosecution.
- Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 19.12.2018 Siddhant Sahu
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance by the appellant.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
G. Chandra
- respondent
Nathi Lal
Coram
Sudhir Agarwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- SAPL/2959/1983
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court