The writ petition was dismissed as not pressed because the petitioner was unable to respond to a query raised by the Court by an earlier order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16104 of 2018
Petitioner :- Shiksha Prasarni Sabha, Dhotari, Ghazipur Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Awadhesh Kumar Malviya,Satya Prakash Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Girdhar Prasad Tripathi,Satya Prakash Pandey
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
Sri M.N. Shukla holding brief of Sri A.K. Malviya, counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is unable to respond to the query raised by this Court by order dated 9.5.2018. He seeks dismissal of the writ petition as not pressed.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
(Manoj Kumar Gupta, J)
Order Date :- 24.5.2018 SL
Shiksha Prasarni Sabha, Dhotari, Ghazipur
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Manoj Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
