In this writ petition concerning a rent dispute between private parties over a building used for an educational institution, the court dismissed the petition as wholly misconceived, holding it involved only two private persons.
The writ petition was dismissed as it relates to a dispute between two private persons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 15404 of 2018
Petitioner :- Ravi Kushawaha Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sheshavatar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
The averments made in the writ petition reveals that there is a dispute between the petitioner and respondent No. 6 relating to payment of rent, etc. in respect of the building, which the petitioner had taken from respondent No. 6 for running an educational institution.
In the opinion of the Court, the dispute being between two private persons, the instant petition is wholly misconceived. It is accordingly dismissed.
(Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)
Order Date :- 27.4.2018 AM/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can exercise writ jurisdiction over a dispute between two private parties regarding rent for an educational institution.
Ravi Kushawaha
State Of U.P.
Manoj Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
