Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a directive to grant a No Objection Certificate/Licence for running a Saw mill. The court directed the respondent to take an appropriate decision on the petitioner's application within six weeks.
Directed respondent no. 3 to take an appropriate decision on the petitioner's application within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10643 of 2018
Petitioner :- Mohd. Farukh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ifrah Islam,Ehtesham Akhtar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Krishna Murari,J. Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Grievance of the petitioner is that he made an application dated 05.01.2018 for grant of 'No Objection Certificate/'Licence' to run a Saw mill before respondent no. 3 but till date no decision has been taken.
Considering the facts, we dispose of the writ petition directing respondent no. 3 to take appropriate decision on the application made by the petitioner expeditiously, preferably, within a period of six weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.
Order Date :- 27.3.2018 nd
1 issue framed by the court
Whether writ jurisdiction should be invoked to direct the respondent to decide the petitioner's application for a No Objection Certificate/Licence to run a Saw mill expeditiously.
Mohd. Farukh
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Krishna Murari
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
