Raj Kumar Sharma v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court consigned the writ petition to records as the relief had already been granted via a Settlement Officer's release of funds. Appearance dispensed with.
The High Court consigned the writ petition to records as the relief had already been granted via a Settlement Officer's release of funds. Appearance dispensed with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 58
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9742 of 2018
Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Atul Sharma,Ajay Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J.
Pursuant to the order passed on 13.7.2018, the Settlement Officer Consolidation, Etah, is present before the Court. An affidavit is filed by the officer concerned stating that the amount due and payable to petitioner has been released by 9.5.2018. The affidavit filed today is not opposed on behalf of the petitioner.
Since the relief prayed for has already been granted, no further grievance survives. Writ petition is, accordingly, consigned to records. Personal appearance of the officer concerned is dispensed with.
Order Date :- 24.7.2018 Ashok Kr.
Raj Kumar Sharma
State Of U.P.
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court