A single judge dismissed a writ petition seeking appointment under an advertisement, noting the recruitment process concluded years prior and the petition was barred by laches.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 58
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 15325 of 2018
Petitioner :- Kapil Kumar Singh Respondent :- Union Of India And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Santosh Kumar Mishra
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J.
Petitioner wants consideration of his claim for appointment pursuant to an advertisement dated 31.07.2010.
Shri S.K. Mishra and Shri J.K.N. Sharma, for the respondents, point out that process of recruitment was concluded in the year 2012 itself and therefore, this petition is grossly barred by laches.
Even otherwise, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner to argue the matter, even in the revised list.
The petition is dismissed, accordingly.
Order Date :- 24.7.2018 Amit Mishra
Kapil Kumar Singh
Union Of India
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
