Court disposed of the initial writ petition by relying on the terms of a previous order issued in a consistent case, without independent adjudication on the merits.
Disposed of the writ petition on the same terms as in a previous order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 58
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5314 of 2018
Petitioner :- Suryakant Verma Respondent :- Union Of India Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Singh,Ganesh Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Apurva Hajela
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J.
Learned counsel for the parties do not dispute that the controversy, raised in the present petition, stands adjudicate by an order of this Court dated 16.04.2018 passed in Writ A No. 2813 of 2017 ( Ran Vijay Singh and 34 Others Vs. Union of India and 6 Others ).
For the reasons recorded therein, this petition is also disposed of on the same terms
Order Date :- 23.7.2018 Amit Mishra
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ran Vijay Singh and 34 Others Vs. Union of India and 6 OthersFollowed¶6
Ran Vijay Singh and 34 Others Vs. Union of India and 6 Others
Suryakant Verma
Union Of India
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
