Petitioner, appointed as Assistant Teacher, sought approval and salary. Court disposed of petition following a prior precedent, directing the District Inspector of Schools to decide after hearing the third respondent.
Directing the second respondent to decide the matter after hearing the third respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7924 of 2018 Petitioner :- Pankaj Mishra Respondent :- State Of U P And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R. K. Singh Kaosik Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner claims to have been appointed as Assistant Teacher in Panchayat Raj Inter College, Mokalpur, Jaunpur under sub-section 11 of Section 16-E of Intermediate Education Act, 1921. By the instant petition, petitioner seeks approval and salary from the second respondent-District Inspector of Schools, Jaunpur.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy involved in the petition is squarely covered by a decision of this Court dated 31.10.2017 passed in Sushil Kumar Yadav and another vs. State of U.P. and 3 others, (Writ - A No. 48244 of 2017). Therefore, it is urged that the writ petition may be decided in terms of the aforementioned decision.
Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel does not dispute the legal proposition.
Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of in terms of the decision rendered in Sushil Kumar Yadav and another (supra). The decision shall be taken by the second respondent after hearing the third respondent.
Order Date :- 15.3.2018 RKP
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is eligible for approval and salary as Assistant Teacher under the Intermediate Education Act, 1921.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sushil Kumar Yadav and another vs. State of U.P. and 3 othersFollowed¶6
Sushil Kumar Yadav and another vs. State of U.P. and 3 others, (Writ - A No. 48244 of 2017)
Pankaj Mishra
State Of U P
District Inspector of Schools, Jaunpur
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
