The petitioner sought a writ direction to treat her as a Para Teacher and grant Rs.38,000 monthly honorarium. The court disposed of the petition directing the respondent to decide her representation within two months.
The petitioner's representation dated 11.2.2018 must be decided by the first respondent within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7843 of 2018
Petitioner :- Malti Verma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Gyan Prakash Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Bhanu Pratap Singh
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the first respondent as well as Shri B.P. Singh for the second respondent.
The petitioner is before this Court with request to issue direction to the respondents to consider her claim for payment of Rs.38,000/- as monthly honorarium treating her as Para Teacher as she has completed their BTC Course and in this regard, the budget was also allocated by the Government of India in its meeting dated 15.5.2017.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in this regard the petitioner has already represented the matter before the first respondent on 11.2.2018. She has confined her prayer only to the relief that the petitioners' representation dated 11.2.2018 may be considered by the appropriate authority.
Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has no objection to the said prayer.
No useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending.
In view of above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this writ petition is disposed of finally with a direction to the first respondent to decide the petitioner's representation in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before him.
Order Date :- 15.3.2018 SP/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ direction should be issued to the respondent to consider the petitioner's claim for monthly honorarium as a Para Teacher.
Malti Verma
State Of U.P.
Another
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
