The Court disposed of the writ petition by following a previous judgment, directing the respondent authorities to forward the petitioner's transfer application manually due to failure to upload required details online.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6493 of 2018 Petitioner :- Renu Gupta Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Jay Ram Pandey,Santosh Kumar
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner is before this Court for a direction to second respondent i.e. U.P. Basic Education Board, Allahabad through its Secretary to upload the data of the petitioner on the website and permit the petitioner to submit her application for transfer on the website.
Learned counsel for the petitioner apprises to the Court that the controversy in hand is squarely covered by the judgment dated 6.3.2018 passed in Writ-A No.6976 of 2018 (Deepika Tiwari & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Ors.) and the similar indulgence may also be accorded in this writ petition. The operative portion of the order dated 6.3.2018 is quoted as under:-
From the instructions brought on record, it is apparent that petitioners' details i.e. PAN number and Bank Account number were not updated by the respondents on the online data. Admittedly it was for the respondents to have uploaded all such details on the website. It appears that there has been some communication between the office of District Basic Education Officer and the District Information & Science Officer, N.I.C., Kushinagar for updating the details of the petitioners. It is, however, not disputed that the details of the petitioners have not been uploaded and in its absence, the petitioners could not apply online for processing of their transfer application.
Once the petitioners were entitled to apply for consideration of their transfer applications, and such applications have not been entertained for any fault in uploading of details by the respondents, the petitioners cannot be made to suffer.
Petitioners, therefore, are entitled to the relief prayed for.
This writ petition, consequently, stands disposed of with a direction upon the District Basic Education Officer, Kushinagar, to entertain and forward the transfer applications of the petitioners manually, within a week from today, to the concerned authorities for its examination and processing in accordance with the policy framed for the purpose."
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the present writ petition is also disposed of in the same terms as have been given in Deepika Tiwari & Ors. (Supra) .
Order Date :- 20.3.2018 sailesh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a direction for uploading data and permitting online transfer application despite respondent's default.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Deepika Tiwari & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Ors.Followed¶12
Writ-A No.6976 of 2018 (Deepika Tiwari & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Ors.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Renu Gupta
State Of Up
U.P. Basic Education Board, Allahabad
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
