The court disposed of a writ petition by relying on a prior judgment in Writ A No.2868 of 2018, noting the controversy was squarely covered by that decision.
The writ petition was disposed of in terms of the judgment in Writ A No.2868 of 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5703 of 2018
Petitioner :- Ruby Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rishi Kant Rai,Dinesh Pratap Rao Dixit,Rishi Kant Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,C.S.C.,Jai Krishna Tiwari
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Learned counsel for the parties submit that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgement and order rendered on 06.02.2018 in Writ A No.2868 of 2018 (Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 ors) .
The writ petition, is accordingly, disposed of in terms of the judgement rendered in Writ A No.2868 of 2018 (Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 ors) .
Order Date :- 15.2.2018 A. Pandey
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 orsFollowed¶5
Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 ors
Ruby
State Of U.P.
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Parties & counsel
