The court disposed of the writ petition by following a judgment in Writ A No. 2868 of 2018, holding the controversy to be squarely covered.
Writ petition disposed of by following the judgment in Writ A No. 2868 of 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5622 of 2018
Petitioner :- Fozia Farhat Siddiqi Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajiv Sisodia,Dhirendra Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Akhilesh Chandra Srivastava,Daya Ram
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Learned counsel for the parties submit that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order rendered on 6.2.2018 in Writ A No.2868 of 2018 ( Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 others ).
The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of in terms of the judgment rendered in Writ A No.2868 of 2018 (Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 others).
Order Date :- 13.2.2018 SP/
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 othersFollowed¶5
Writ A No.2868 of 2018 ( Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 others )
Fozia Farhat Siddiqi
State Of Up And 3 Others
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
