The court disposed of the writ petition by upholding the judgment and order dated 6.2.2018 delivered in Writ A No.2868 of 2018. No substantive reasoning is provided.
The writ petition was disposed of in terms of the judgment in Writ A No.2868 of 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5137 of 2018
Petitioner :- Samvedana Maurya Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R.C. Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ram Prakash Shukla
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Learned counsel for the parties submit that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order rendered on 6.2.2018 in Writ A No.2868 of 2018 ( Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 others ).
The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of in terms of the judgment rendered in Writ A No.2868 of 2018 (Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 others).
Order Date :- 7.2.2018 SP/
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 othersRelied on¶5
Writ A No.2868 of 2018 ( Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 others )
Samvedana Maurya
State Of U.P.
Other 1
Other 2
Other 3
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
