Petitioner prayed for disposition of the writ petition relying on an identical order in a separate petition. The bench disposed of the matter in terms of the cited judgment on the same day.
Petition disposed of in terms of judgment in Writ A No.2868 of 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5083 of 2018
Petitioner :- Kalpana Raikwar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Syed Mushfiq Ali Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Learned counsel for the parties submit that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order rendered on 6.2.2018 in Writ A No.2868 of 2018 ( Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 others ).
The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of in terms of the judgment rendered in Writ A No.2868 of 2018 (Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 others).
Order Date :- 7.2.2018 RKP
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 othersFollowed¶5
Writ A No.2868 of 2018 ( Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 others )
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kalpana Raikwar
State Of U.P.
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
