The petitioner urged disposal of her writ petition under a judgment in a related writ case. The bench disposed of the current petition in accordance with the existing judgment.
Disposed in terms of the judgment in Writ A No.2868 of 2018 (Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 others).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5095 of 2018
Petitioner :- Meenu Kumari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Petitioner :- Devendra Kumar Shukla,Prem Sagar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ram Chandra
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Learned counsel for the parties submit that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order rendered on 6.2.2018 in Writ A No.2868 of 2018 ( Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 others ).
The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of in terms of the judgment rendered in Writ A No.2868 of 2018 (Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 others).
Order Date :- 7.2.2018 RKP
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 others, Writ A No.2868 of 2018Referred¶5
Meenu Kumari
State Of U.P.
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Parties & counsel
