Petitioner withdrew writ petition arguing that the controversy was covered by a concurrent order in Writ A No. 5308 of 2018; petition partly allowed.
Petition partly allowed in terms of the judgment in Writ A No. 5308 of 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5106 of 2018
Petitioner :- Arun Kumar Sharma Respondent :- State Of Up And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Alok Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Learned counsel appearing for the parties state that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the order rendered today in WRIT - A No. - 5308 of 2018 (Punam Singh Vs. State Of U.P.).
The writ petition is also partly allowed in terms of the judgment rendered today in WRIT - A No. - 5308 of 2018 (Punam Singh Vs. State Of U.P.).
Order Date :- 28.3.2018 shiv
Arun Kumar Sharma
State Of Up
Another
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
