The Court allowed the writ petition by reference to a contemporaneous judgment in WRIT - A No. 5308 of 2018, rendering the present petition partly allowed without independent reasoning.
Petition partly allowed by reference to WRIT - A No. 5308 of 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1959 of 2018
Petitioner :- Mithlesh Kumar Tripathi And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Upadhyay,Santosh Kumar Upadhyay
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Learned counsel appearing for the parties state that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the order rendered today in WRIT - A No. - 5308 of 2018 (Punam Singh Vs. State Of U.P.).
The writ petition is also partly allowed in terms of the judgment rendered today in WRIT - A No. - 5308 of 2018 (Punam Singh Vs. State Of U.P.).
Order Date :- 28.3.2018 shiv
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Punam Singh Vs. State Of U.P.Followed¶6
WRIT - A No. - 5308 of 2018 (Punam Singh Vs. State Of U.P.)
Mithlesh Kumar Tripathi
State Of U.P.
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
