Sanjeev Kumar v. State of U.P. and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner chose not to press the writ petition any further, resulting in its dismissal as withdrawn.
The petitioner chose not to press the writ petition any further, resulting in its dismissal as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 13
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 49481 of 2009
Petitioner :- Sanjeev Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajendra Jaiswal,Ajay Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,N. Misra,Prakash Padia
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Sri V.N.Tripathi, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ajay Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner does not want to press this writ petition any more.
Writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Sri Subodh Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Sri Prakash Padia, learned counsel for the respondent is present.
Order Date :- 30.5.2018 Sanjeev
Sanjeev Kumar
State Of U.P.
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court