In the absence of the petitioner, the court perused the record of a writ petition challenging an appointment and dismissed it, holding no case for interference and the writ infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 48639 of 2003
Petitioner :- Sri Ram Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Punit Kuamr Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 20.12.2018
PS
Sri Ram Yadav
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
