Writ petition was dismissed as the petitioner was absent and failed to make out a case for interference, causing the matter to be declared infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 48412 of 2003
Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Saini Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- S.P. Singh,Vinod Sinha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,K.R. Sirohi, Ashish Mishra
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
“ 1) a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dt. 22.10.2003 passed by respondent no. 2 (Annexure No. 4).
2) a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing respondents not to give effect to impugned order dt. 22.10.2003 passed by respondent no. 2 (Annexure No. 4).”
Order Date :- 20.12.2018
PS
Sunil Kumar Saini
State Of U.P.
Another
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
