A writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner did not appear, after an interim order was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 43365 of 2004
Petitioner :- Prabkahar Pandey Respondent :- Director, Allahabad Museum Allahabad And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Subhash Ghosh Counsel for Respondent :- S.S.C.,Chandan Sharama,M.K.Singh,Subodh Kumar
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
Case called out.
No one appears for the petitioner to press this writ petition. Shri Rajesh Tiwari is present for the respondent nos. 1 and 2.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 20.9.2018 A. V. Singh
Prabkahar Pandey
Director, Allahabad Museum Allahabad
B. Amit Sthalekar
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
