Pankajesh v. Chairman Allahaba Up Gramin Bank and 14 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 20232 of 2018…
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 20232 of 2018…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 20232 of 2018
Petitioner :- Pankajesh Respondent :- Chairman Allahaba Up Gramin Bank And 14 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gopal Verma,Prashant Vardhan Counsel for Respondent :- Satish Kishore Kakkar
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
Sri Prashant Vardhan, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the relief claimed in the writ petition has been granted to the petitioner and, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous and may be dismissed as such.
The writ petition is accordingly, dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sri Satish Kishore Kakkar is present for the respondent nos. 1,2 and 3.
Order Date :- 20.9.2018 sfa/
Pankajesh
Chairman Allahaba Up Gramin Bank
B. Amit Sthalekar
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court