The court dismissed the writ petition relying on the principle laid down in Writ-A No. 38235 of 2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 38247 of 2016
Petitioner :- Smt. Geeta Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Birendra Pratap Yadav,Alok Kumar Gupta,Arun Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Manoj Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Learned counsel for parties are ad idem that this petition would merit disposal in light of judgment rendered in Writ-A No. 38235 of 2016 (Smt. Manjula Devi Vs. State of U.P. And Others) .
Accordingly and for the reasons noted therein, the writ petition is dismissed .
Order Date :- 30.10.2018/faraz
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Smt. Manjula Devi Vs. State of U.P. And OthersReferred¶5
Writ-A No. 38235 of 2016 (Smt. Manjula Devi Vs. State of U.P. And Others)
Smt. Geeta Devi
State Of U.P.
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
