Court allowed the writ petition on similar terms as noted in Writ-A No. 35333 of 2016, with no substantive reasoning provided in this order.
Writ petition allowed on similar terms as decided in Writ-A No. 35333 of 2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 35336 of 2016
Petitioner :- Mata Prasad, Roll No. 4114189888 Respondent :- Union Of India And 3 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Gautam,Mohammad Fahad Counsel for Respondent :- Vivek Singh
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Learned counsel for parties are ad idem that this petition would merit being allowed in light of the decision rendered by this Court in Writ-A No. 35333 of 2016 (Bhupendra Singh Vs. Union of India and others).
Accordingly and for the reasons noted therein, the writ petition is allowed on similar terms.
Order Date :- 30.10.2018
LA/-
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Bhupendra Singh Vs. Union of India and othersRelied on¶5
Writ-A No. 35333 of 2016 (Bhupendra Singh Vs. Union of India and others)
Mata Prasad
Union Of India
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
