In a revisional call, the Bench dismissed the writ petition seeking appointment as a Constable under Sports quota as the petitioner made out no case and the matter was deemed infructuous due to counsel absence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 19883 of 2001 Petitioner :- Amar Deep Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Suresh Chandra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
" i. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the letter/order dt. 8.2.2001 (Annexure-5 to the writ petition) to the respondent no.2;
ii. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing to the respondent no.2 to issue appointment letter to the petitioner for the post of Constable under the Sports quota;
iii. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.2 and directing him to take decision on appointment on the petitioner either at his level or by issuing direction to any District Superintendent of Police U.P."
Order Date :- 24.8.2018 KA
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Amar Deep
State Of U.P.
Respondent No. 2
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
