The court held that the revision was rendered infructuous due to subsequent developments. Consequently, the reserved judgment was not delivered and the revision was dismissed.
Revision dismissed as infructuous; judgment delivered in the open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 9
Case :- S.C.C. REVISION No. - 175 of 2015 Revisionist :- Dr. Rajiv Kumar Tiwari And Anr. Opposite Party :- Yogesh Kumar Garg And 3 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Chandan Kumar,Anil Kumar Pandey,Arvind Srivastava,Manish Goyal,S.P.Giri Counsel for Opposite Party :- Tarun Agarwal
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J.
This matter is listed today for delivery of judgement.
Learned counsel for the parties admit that this revision has been rendered infructuous on account of certain subsequent developments.
Under the circumstances, the judgement, which has been reserved is not being delivered and the revision is hereby dismissed, as infructuous.
Order Date :- 18.7.2018 RKM
Anjani Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
