Gauri Shankar v. Ram Gopal
Case brief
What is this about?
Counsel for the appellant failed to appear with complete instructions. The court dismissed the second appeal for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for lack of prosecution; interim order vacated.
What the court decided
Court No. - 57
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 1749 of 1991
Appellant :- Gauri Shankar Respondent :- Ram Gopal Counsel for Appellant :- Shesh Kumar,P.K.Bisaria
Hon'ble Shashi Kant,J.
Sri Dev Kaushik, Advocate holding brief of Sri Shesh Kumar, learned counsel for appellant states that despite repeated efforts, instructions cannot be completed yet.
In view of above, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 24.1.2018 A. Verma
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Gauri Shankar
- respondent
Ram Gopal
Coram
Shashi Kant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- SAPL/1749/1991
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court