The court listed the appeal and dismissed it for want of prosecution because the appellant did not appear to press the appeal despite notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 57
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 198 of 1995
Appellant :- Munshi Respondent :- Bhoorey Lal & Others Counsel for Appellant :- Ajeet Kumar
Hon'ble Shashi Kant,J.
List revised. None appears to press the appeal.
Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 19.1.2018 A. Verma
Munshi
Bhoorey Lal
Shashi Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
