Jamil Ahamad v. Islamuddin
Case brief
What is this about?
This court dismissed Second Appeal No. 691 of 1993 for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear to press the appeal. The case is classified as other.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution and the interim order stands vacated.
What the court decided
Court No. - 57
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 691 of 1993
Appellant :- Jamil Ahamad Respondent :- Islamuddin Counsel for Appellant :- Chandra Shekhar Sharma,A.K. Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- A.D. Prabhakar,A.K. Singh
Hon'ble Shashi Kant,J.
List revised.
None appeared on behalf of appellant to press this appeal.
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This order has been passed in presence of Sri A.K. Singh, learned counsel for respondent.
Order Date :- 19.1.2018 A. Verma
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Jamil Ahamad
- respondent
Islamuddin
Coram
Shashi Kant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- SAPL/691/1993
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court