Dismissed
Nazar Husain v. Murari Lal
Allahabad HCSAPL/152/1981
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The second appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as the sole appellant failed to appear to press the same. The appeal is called in revise.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal No. 152 of 1981 dismissed for want of prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Court No. - 34
¶2
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 152 of 1981
¶3
Appellant :- Nazar Husain Respondent :- Murari Lal Counsel for Appellant :- Counsel for Respondent :- J.N.Singh,P.M.Gupta
¶4
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
¶5
- Notice was issued to sole appellant to engage another counsel on 10.10.2014, which was sent by registered post on 17.11.2014. Perused Office report dated 18.12.2018 which shows that registered letter has not been received back undelivered. Service is deemed sufficient under the Rules.
¶6
- Called in revise. None appeared to press this appeal.
¶7
- Dismissed for want of prosecution.
¶8
- Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
¶9
Order Date :- 20.12.2018 Manish Himwan
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Nazar Husain
- respondent
Murari Lal
Coram
AI extract
Sudhir Agarwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- SAPL/152/1981
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court