Kailashi v. Sunita
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Revision dismissed. The Hon'ble Family Court ordered maintenance due to the revisionist's refusal to house the opposite party. The high court found the order justified and refused interference despite non-appearance by the revisionist.
What the court decided
Court No. - 45
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1709 of 1992
Revisionist :- Kailashi Opposite Party :- Sunita Counsel for Revisionist :- V K Chaturvedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.G.A.,V K Sharma
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
As per the report of the C.J.M. Agra, notice sent for engaging another counsel has already been served. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the revisionist.
None appears on behalf of the revisionist even in the revised call. Heard learned A.G.A. for the State.
This revision is directed against the order dated 2.11.1992 passed by the Family Court, Agra in Case No.183 of 1992 awarding an amount of Rs.500/- per month to the opposite party towards maintenance.
A perusal of the order shows that the revisionist refused to keep opposite party in his house and therefore, court below directed that the aforesaid amount of maintenance should be paid to her per month by the revisionist. The order is justified and calls for no interference.
This revision fails and is dismissed accordingly.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Family Court's order directing the husband to pay maintenance is justified and requires interference in criminal revision.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kailashi
- respondent
Sunita
Coram
Siddharth
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/1709/1992
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court