Tulsi Ram v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The criminal miscellaneous writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner was absent on the date of hearing.
The criminal miscellaneous writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner was absent on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23564 of 2017
Petitioner :- Tulsi Ram Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Kesari Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.
Case called out in the revised list. No one is present on behalf of the petitioners to press this petition. Sri Irshad Husain, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(D.K. Singh-I, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Order Date :- 4.4.2018 A. Mandhani
Tulsi Ram
State Of U.P.
Ramesh Sinha
Dinesh Kumar Singh-I
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court